Below is an email GERA has sent to each Councillor re yesterday’s early removal of trees in Caulfield Park. For the past month, the Friends of Caulfield Park (FoCP) have been campaigning against the removal of 39 (later reduced to 21) trees in the park to allow for the expansion of sporting ovals. Full details of FoCP’s campaign are available on Facebook and their website
Although works were scheduled to start in January, 2014, and Council was fully aware of community opposition to the removal of the trees (including this morning’s presentation of a petition to State Parliament) Council removed the trees yesterday morning. Leader Article 10/12/2013
Each dirt mound represents a lost tree.
Email from GERA to Councillors (10/12/2013)
Below are two self explanatory emails,
- the first from GERA to our members and associates, commenting today’s removal of trees in Caulfield Park and Council’s stated goal of encouraging community participation in the decision making process.
- the second from Friends of Caulfield Park (FoCP), which in addition to commenting on Council’s arguments for the tree removal also comments on their assessment of Councils performance.
Could you please comment on
- your opinion of, and justification for, the original proposal – removal of 39 tree for the expansion of 2 sporting ovals (no need to comment on the spurious arguments already disputed by the FoC, unless you disagree with their “spurious” nature)
- your opinion of, and justification for, Council’s alternate proposal of saving some trees and the “possible” relocation of 13 others (an alternative not included in the original proposal – yet which arguably should have been)
- your opinion of the alternate proposal presented by the FoCP – pros and cons
- Your position (i.e. vote) on the removal of the trees today as reported by Mayor Pilling and the date of the meeting at which this voting occurred
Email from GERA to Members and Associates (10/12/2013)
GERA has received the below email from the Friends of Caulfield Park re the removal of 39 parkland trees to provide for the expansion of 2 sporting ovals.
Scheduled to commence in January, 2014, in the midst of much, extremely vocal, community opposition and presentation of an alternate plan and on the eve of the presentation of a petition (signed by 500+) to the State Government (Caulfield Park is Crown Land, managed by Council), the trees were cut down this morning (10/12/2013).
At a social function early last week, I along with other residents, raised the Caulfield Park 39 tree removal proposal with newly elected Greens Mayor Neil Pilling. Mayor Pilling recognized that it had become a bigger issue than was expected but believed a compromise solution would be found. Given the Council’s actions today, it is needless to say that GERA is not only appalled but does not disagree with FoCP’s assessment of Council performance against Council’s stated goal of encouraging community participation in the decision making process.
GERA joins FoCP in urging members to contact Councillors to voice their dissatisfaction.
Email from Friends of Caulfield Park advising tree removal (10/12/2013)
Council “thumbs it nose” at the Community
Like storm troopers, the secret executioners gathered in the early hours of this morning and, instructed by the administration and its officers, swooped on the 39 trees and cut them down.
The mayor said all the Councillors were behind this move.
He said there was nothing wrong with this action.
We know not all the Councillors were behind him and were kept in the dark about this destruction.
We believe that the Mayor and the administration realised that the FoCP petition of over 500 names (gathered in less than a week) would be presented to Parliament tomorrow and that their plan to cut down the trees would be in jeopardy. They thought once cut down they were gone and they could proceed with their ill-conceived plan in peace. With the Festive Season upon us we would all forget their contemptuous action and let them get on with it. This is bureaucracy at its arrogant worst in overriding community wishes.
We have shown how their justifications for cutting down the trees are fabrications. So what is the real reason for their determination to proceed, no matter what the community thinks?
If anyone knows the background to their hidden agenda, please drop a note to PO Box 2511 Caulfield Junction 3161. It appears that they are somehow beholden to sports clubs above all other interests. Something is rotten in the City of Glen Eira
David Wilde is handing in the Petition on the Parliament steps tomorrow at 9 am and would like others to join him. …… We realise this is short notice, but please do your best.
What next? The Council thinks it can thumb its nose at us. They need to learn that the community is not impressed with their anti-social, anti-community behaviour. There are two issues here. The one is the loss of the trees, and the other is the Council’s total disregard for the expressed concern of the community about this matter.
Let the Council know what you think of them. Here are their contact details. Email, message and phone them and tell them their behaviour is no longer acceptable. Tell them we want those trees replaced with mature trees where those that were cut down previously stood, and that they cannot spurn the community in this way.